Will our starving shorebirds survive?

Please give today! Before it’s too late!

Can you imagine walking 11,000 kilometres…

Without food?

How long do you think you would last?

Australia’s migratory shorebirds face this terrifying scenario.

If you’re a shorebird like the Great Knot, you fly an incredible 11,000 kilometres every year, from Siberia to Australia. During this migration, you lose up to 70% of your body weight.

So to survive, you MUST stop to eat along the way.

But what happens when your key feeding grounds are being destroyed?

When the 33 km-long seawall at Saemangeum in the Republic of Korea was constructed, destroying the mudflats that were rich in shellfish…

90,000 Great Knots starved – a quarter of their global population.

Today, other feeding habitat for shorebirds is under threat, both overseas and in Australia.

That’s why I urge you to DONATE NOW to save vital feeding habitat
for starving shorebirds like the Great Knot.

The population of this critically endangered species has already dropped by more than 83% over the last 25 years.

If we don’t act now, future generations will be unable to enjoy these remarkable birds and marvel at their incredible migratory journeys.

Your gift today will be used to help:

  • Fight against further reclamation of mudflats in the Republic of Korea – every piece of feeding habitat left is vital for hungry migrating shorebirds.
  • Restore and protect the most important wetlands for shorebirds in Australia – as identified in a new wetlands directory. This includes working with landowners and managers to improve shorebird habitat.
  • Fight against shorebird habitat loss due to inappropriate development – such as the $1.4 billion residential and marina proposal at Toondah Harbour, which will destroy important feeding habitat if it proceeds.
  • Build floating roosts to give threatened shorebirds a safe place to land where they can rest and forage for food nearby.

No one wants to see another 90,000 Great Knots starve to death.

Migratory shorebirds don’t have to die… if you and I act now!


Thank you for helping to save starving shorebirds.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Sullivan, CEO, BirdLife Australia

Image: Great Knots. Photo: Andrew Silcocks.

Join Us Volunteer Volunteer

BIEPA – as one of the supporting entities of this project – was invited by Healthy Land and Water to observe the deployment into the Passage, opposite Kakadu Beach, of the second batch of modules.

Dr. Ben Diggles was on the barge supervising the immersion, by crane and with the help of divers, of the oyster shell and besser block modules.

It was interesting to hear from the University of the Sunshine Coast scientist that the results of the first survey since the initial deployment of reef modules in December 2017 had been very encouraging as regards the numbers of fish and of fish species that had been observed around the shellfish reefs. For more information on this project, see www.restorepumicestonepassage.org


An update from the National Parks Association Qld.
Coming together for national parks.
Welcome to the Summer 2018 edition of Protected.

As 2018 ends it is worthwhile to consider our work in 2018 and how we might be more effective in the coming year.

This year NPAQ and over 20 other conservation groups came together to call for national park expansion and better management. We are hopeful that government funding and resources will be focused on enhancing our protected area estate. In the meantime, we seek a moratorium on eco-tourism developments.

We are campaigning and petitioning to make this happen.

Visit www.npaq.org.au to sign the parliamentary petition against development in national parks and support our campaign.

Finally, I would like to thank our collegiate and dedicated Council, staff who are often doing a lot with very little and volunteers who make a great contribution.

Wishing you all a happy and peaceful Christmas!

Graeme Bartrim – NPAQ President

In this edition of Protected
Images and headlines link to articles.
Full magazine download available here.
Coming together for protected areas
Our state’s biodiversity has borne the brunt of much of our activity.
Our living outback
A place of beauty and diversity, the Australian outback is one of the last great regions of nature left on Earth. Outback Queensland boasts landscapes, rich in natural and cultural heritage, covering nearly two-thirds of our state.
Wetlands: under threat
The Ramsar convention encourages the designation of sites containing representative, rare or unique wetlands, or wetlands that are important for conserving biological diversity.
Conservation on neighbouring lands
Nestled along the border with New South Wales, Queensland’s Sundown National Park is a rocky gem about 300 kilometres southwest of Brisbane. Noted for its ridges and steep gorges, Sundown National Park can be reached by walking track and off-road vehicle.
Dingo dinners
The dingo is Australia’s largest land-based predator, occurring across most of the mainland and on many nearshore islands. New research, published in the journal Mammal Review, reveals the breadth and diversity of dingo diets across the continent.
Park experience
It’s a tiny pocket of woodland squeezed to the west by the Bruce Highway, to the south by Deception Bay Rd, and on its other flanks by residential developments.
Ranger of the month
A Park Ranger in Great Sandy National Park. A Butchulla man (the Butchulla people are the Aboriginal Traditional Owners of K’gari aka Fraser Island). Holding an identified Indigenous Ranger position and a passion for culture. Find out more about the ranger of the month.
Activities & events

New year twilight celebration
Sunday, 6 January

Toorbul Birdwatching
Sunday, 20 January

February members meeting
Wednesday, 20 February

May members meeting
Wednesday, 15 May

NPAQ Events

The developer, the whistleblower and the minister – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

We are forwarding this information to you just in case you have not seen it on the news.
BIEPA has spent many years lobbying all three levels of government (federal, state and local) when making decisions that will have long term negative impacts on the health of our natural environment, to heed the commitments made in international conservation agreements.  BIEPA has asked that decision makers acknowledge that Australia has signed these agreements to protect and conserve the country’s natural assets and environment identified as being of international importance.
It is always disappointing to realise that, in reality, decisions are made without due reference to these international agreements (including national policies and legislations designed to protect Australia’s natural assets). It appears that honouring the inherent obligations in them is considered by decision makers as unimportant to the “common wealth” of Australians.
Birdlife Australia and the Australian Conservation Foundation are joining forces with many environmental and community groups in an effort to protect the Wetlands and endangered migratory bird species from the Toodnah Harbour development.
Many thanks for your attention to this important issue.
from your BIEPA Management Committee



The developer, the whistleblower and the minister

A trip to Switzerland, a legal threat, department staff under pressure. A rare blow-by-blow inside account of how power and influence is wielded in a sensitive environmental approval process.

A tree on the horizon at Toondah Harbour south Brisbane.Photo: The wetlands of Toondah Harbour are protected by an international convention. (ABC News: David Lewis)When you look out at Cleveland’s Toondah Harbour at low tide, the first thing you see is the mudflats.

The mudflats stretch away into the distance, flanked by hills.Photo: The mudflats may look nondescript but they are home to a many bird species. (ABC News: David Lewis)Legend has it, this was meant to be the capital of Queensland.

But back in the 1840s during an exploratory trip, Governor Gipps got stuck in the mud and instead went up the river to what’s now Brisbane.

ClevelandPhoto: Shore Street, Cleveland, ca 1907 is pictured on one of the Valentine’s Series of postcards. (Source: Qld State Library)Cleveland never expanded into a metropolis like Brisbane. Its population sits at around 15,000.

But the local Mayor thinks it’s time the region was transformed into something bigger and more commercially focused.

Aerial photo of the area near Toondah Harbour.Photo: Many live on the canal system in the coastal idyll of Cleveland, Queensland. (ABC News: David Sciasci)

New premier cuts ‘green tape’

Karen Williams was elected the Mayor of Redland City in 2012 with the support of developers.

It was the same year a one-term Queensland premier who wanted to cut what he called “green tape” was put in charge.

Campbell Newman was elected on a platform of change.

He introduced an Economic Development Act to fast-track new projects in the state.

Under the Act, parcels of land could be declared “priority development areas” — or PDAs — and could bypass old planning and environment laws.

Mayor Williams shared Mr Newman’s zeal for getting things built and was determined to transform the region.

The council voted to back the application for a PDA, and in June 2013 the state government declared Toondah Harbour one of Queensland’s first priority development areas.

Expressions of interest were called for, and Walker Corporation was announced as the preferred partner.

Its $1.4 billion plan for the site included 3,600 apartments, a hotel, convention centre and marina.

Artist's impression of the Toondah Harbour development which will include 3,600 apartments.Photo: This is Walker Corporation’s vision for Toondah Harbour. (Supplied: Walker Group)But there was a snag.

Moreton Bay, where Toondah Harbour sits, was declared a Ramsar site in 1993, under an international convention that protects wetlands critical for biodiversity.

Around 40 hectares of the priority development area lies inside that Ramsar-listed wetland.

Enter the developer

In the last 20 years, Lang Walker’s company has donated around $2.5 million to political parties.

The Forbes rich list claims he’s worth over $2 billion, and he is behind a series of high-profile developments including Collins Square in Melbourne, the Finger Wharf in Sydney and Festival Square in Adelaide.

He has even built a luxury resort on his own private island in Fiji.

Lang Walker wears a suit and looks down the barrel of the camera. In the background is some kind of painting on the wall.Photo: Developer Lang Walker bought an island. (Walker Corporation)Bloomberg estimates the resort, near one of the world’s largest coral reefs, cost Lang Walker $100 million to build.

He named it Kokomo.

As a man who knows how to buy an island and has spent decades striking big deals in Australia’s largest cities, Mr Walker had the upper hand when he flew to Queensland to sign a memorandum of understanding with Redland City councillors at the historic Grand View Hotel overlooking Toondah Harbour.

The council gag order

Craig Ogilvie was a councillor at the time.

Former Redland councillor Craig Ogilvie stands on a snow-covered road.Photo: Former council member Craig Ogilvie says little time was given to consider the plans. (Supplied: Craig Ogilvie)“My impression of Lang Walker was that he was practised and slick and probably by far the most knowledgeable and smartest guy in the room when it came to doing deals of this type, and that was something to be nervous about,” Mr Ogilvie said.

I think … to a certain degree the councillors were starstruck.

Craig Ogilvie remembers the process as being rushed and secretive, and says the community was barely consulted.

He claims councillors had little time to consider the plans, and were asked to sign confidentiality arrangements that were quite stringent.

Background Briefing

The bird and the businessman

A billionaire developer wants to build on the protected habitat of an endangered migratory bird. So who prevails in a battle between conservation and construction?

Councillor Wendy Boglary has been on council since March 2008 and was the deputy mayor for two years.

She said she felt the confidentiality agreement was preventing her from properly representing her constituents.

“People are actually coming down to me and as they’re finding out what is happening at Toondah Harbour, they have grave concerns,” Cr Boglary said.

“They’re asking me ‘why aren’t I speaking out?’ and ‘why aren’t I representing them?’.

“So I feel like I’m letting my community down, which isn’t something I take lightly.”

Mayor Williams told the ABC confidentiality agreements protected the ratepayers as well as the companies who had signed contracts with the council.

She said the area needed investment in infrastructure, which a large project like the Walker Corporation’s would bring.

“We’re a city of islands, so we need to have transport hubs that connect our mainland to our communities on Russell Island right through to North Stradbroke Island,” Mayor Williams said.

Bar-tailed godwits fly low to the water, some standing on a sand bar in the harbour.Photo: Bar-tailed godwits in flight over Toondah Harbour. (Supplied: Chris Walker)

Political heavyweights bear down

With the council locked in, the Queensland Labor government endorsed the project in 2015.

But because the proposed development was on Ramsar-listed wetland, it had to be referred to the federal government for approval.

A development of this scale or impact had never been approved on a Ramsar-listed site in Australia.

Inside the federal environment department, which is required to provide impartial, expert advice on environmental issues, the alarm bells were going off.

In April 2016 Matt Cahill, one of the most senior bureaucrats in the department, wrote to Walker Corporation executive Peter Saba making clear what his experts thought of the project.

“The Department intends to advise the Minister to make a decision that the proposal in its current form is clearly unacceptable,” the letter said.

In other words, the department’s key advisers believed the proposal should be struck out immediately.

In response, Walker Corporation intensified its lobbying efforts:

  • In August, Lang Walker wrote to newly-elected prime minister Malcolm Turnbull congratulating him and asking for a meeting about the Toondah project. Mr Turnbull did not appear to take up that offer, but encouraged him to continue working with then-environment minister Josh Frydenberg and his department.
  • According to Queensland’s The Courier Mail, a special adviser to Mr Turnbull and a staffer were spotted that same month having lunch with Mr Walker at celebrity chef Matt Moran’s upscale eatery Aria.
  • According to departmental documents, Mr Walker met with Mr Frydenberg that same month.
  • Queensland’s then-environment minister Steven Miles and Deputy Premier Jackie Trad also wrote to Mr Frydenberg expressing their government’s support.
  • The ABC understands there were discussions in the department about whether the Ramsar boundaries could be changed so the project could go through and still meet Australia’s treaty obligations.

The Australian Government Solicitor responded with confidential legal advice that the boundaries could be changed if Australia invoked the “urgent national interest test” in the convention but warned that process could take years and involve international scrutiny.

FOI documents show over a 12-month period Walker Corporation convinced the department to delay the decision six times.

In the same financial year the development was sent to the Federal Government for approval, Walker Corporation donated $225,000 to the federal Liberal Party and $23,000 to Queensland Labor.

Walker Corporation’s Craig Addley, the project designer for Toondah Harbour, told the ABC the development’s processes were not influenced by political donations.

“I don’t make the payments or are not aware of the details around them but I think the important point is that this project will not be influenced by those things,” Mr Addley said.

Inside the political maelstrom

A departmental insider, who asked we not disclose their identity, said the pressure inside the department was intense.

“Those of us who hoped the minister would accept the advice, that carefully constructed expert advice, were disappointed,” they said.

“But then the department moved to accommodate the minister’s desires — so still providing advice to the minister about the range of impediments, still pointing out it was clearly inconsistent with Australia’s obligations under the Ramsar convention, but also searching for a pathway to accommodate that development.”

The insider also said the company and the man behind the project were important.

“It’s not some tin-pot development run by some small no-name company,” they said.

“This is Lang Walker. Everyone knows who Lang Walker is.

“Everyone knows he’s politically connected, there were stories he could pick up the phone and talk anytime to the prime minister. I don’t know whether that happened or not. That was certainly the view held.”

Minister rejects department’s advice

In May 2017, after 18 months of delays, Walker Corporation withdrew its original plan and submitted a smaller proposal, which still encroached on around 50 hectares of the Ramsar site.

A month later the department provided formal advice to Mr Frydenberg.

Despite all the back-room wrangling, the department said the second proposal remained “clearly unacceptable” because it would “result in permanent and irreversible damage to the ecological character of the Moreton Bay Ramsar wetland”.

However, Mr Frydenberg rejected that advice in June 2017.

Mr Frydenberg told the ABC he acted within the relevant legislation by sending the project for assessment by an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS):

“Under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act, the minister has the opportunity to enable his department to undertake a full assessment of the project, and in doing so, get more information, which may lead to mitigation or offsets of any significant environmental impact that the project would have.”

He also said Walker Corporation’s donation history had nothing to do with his decision.

Referral a good outcome for Walker Corporation

The decision was a significant victory for Walker Corporation.

The project hadn’t been approved by the Minister, but it had cleared a significant first hurdle.

Figures from the Department of the Environment up to 30 June 2018 show that of the 96 projects that have been assessed by Environmental Impact Statement under the EPBC Act, only one has been refused approval.

Since that decision, Walker’s pursuit of the project has even gone international.

Its corporate adviser Stephen Davis, and Walker executive Mr Saba met with the Ramsar secretary general in Switzerland. The ABC understands they discussed the project.

Back at Toondah Harbour, there are competing views on what should happen next.

Mayor Williams said she hoped the EIS process would scientifically address environmental impacts.

That’s what the process is all about,” Mayor Williams said.

“Council’s done their bit.

“We’ve looked for a solution, we’ve got a tool, we’ve asked [the] community and now we wait for the Federal Government to go through that process if it stacks up.

“If it doesn’t then we’re back to square one.”

Birdlife Australia spokesman Robert Clemens said he hoped the development site would be reconsidered.

“This would be one of the last places you would choose to do something,” Mr Clemens said.

“It’s one of the jewels in this council region.

“If we take a step back and look at all the areas where we could put an apartment complex this would come out at the bottom of the list, surely.”

Listen to Steve Cannane tell this story on Radio National’s Background Briefing 8am Sunday on December 9. It will be replayed on Monday at 2pm or Tuesday at 12am, or you can listen online.

Topics: environmental-impactfederal—state-issuesgovernment-and-politicsenvironmentenvironmental-policybrisbane-4000qld